Do you rate the shows you've watched?
Yes. Having standards is important.
No.
Yes, but I've been planning to go through MAL and reevaluate based on baka-raptor's system.
>>141912602
I'm talking about rating it,like giving it a number.
You can have standards without rating anime.
I have a blog dedicated to rating anime.
>>141912602
Fixed pointless, arbitrary routines are very important to autismal cunts.
>>141912775
And you need standards to rate things.
I used to, but it became too much of an obsession. I strove to have about a 5/10 average and constantly mulled over the rating I was going to give a show while watching it, as well as how I would need to adjust older ratings to match my new experiences. When I realized it was just impairing my ability to enjoy what I was watching I just deleted all my ratings and put the whole thing behind me, and I've never looked back with regret.
nb for blogshit about tertiary bullshit
>>141912992
That's exactly my situation, I think I care too much about rating the shows i've watched, and there's some shows that I liked but it was such a long time ago and my tastes changed so I don't know how to rate them.
>>141912655
This system is fucking dumb
>>141913107
My suggestion is to just let it go. You'll be better off
>>141913113
Nice critique.
>>141912480
I keep a list of shows for memory's sake and mark shows I would recommend with a (*). Its a nice criteria for organising stuff because you don't um and ah about numerical values.
Helps seperate the seasonal wheat from the chaff in a less absolute manner. I may have enjoyed my time with Cute Girls Doing Cute Things 16, but it isn't something I would tell someone to seek out.
No, I've watched over 400 anime but I still feel I'm not wise and experienced enough to give scores. Like for example, I didn't like K-on at all when I first watched it 6 years ago, but only recently I realised it's one of the best SOLs ever. Moe SoL also became my favorite genre. Similar things happened to a lot of other shows because my tastes keep changing and evolving so the some of the scores would be also different at a certain period of time.
>>141912655
this doesnt work for shows that are great yet you would absolutely not want to rewatch
Yes
Its a pretty simple rating. "will re-watch at one point." and "wont re-watch." A lot fall into the later category just because there is so much to watch I don't have the time to go back to something unless I REALLY liked it.
>>141913860
sup grandpa
>>141913937
See >>141913806
No one should trust a saoposter anyway :^)
>>141912655
Why does a show that suffers from extended bout of shittiness lead to a 9? while one that doesn't lead to a 7?
>>141912480
Ninja 3x3 thread? Ninja 3x3 thread.
>>141914075
I don't think red necessarily means 'no' on his flowchart
>>141912655
I don't know who that is and I have no idea how this chart works.
>>141912480
I just rate shows based on how much I enjoyed it.
Rewatch value is different as there are some shows I liked watching but wouldn't consider rewatching.
