http://demo.illustration2vec.net/
Fucking technology
This is actually pretty amazing.
Detailed images seem to break it, but that can be written off to it being a demo version. Pretty cool stuff regardless.
Even got the color of the eyes that I had to zoom in to confirm. I can dig it.
Doesn't seem to have a big selection of characters and you have to be kinda specific with what poses work.
But could be neat when it's finished.
It wont be long until all the anime you watch is generated purely by computers
>>135601038
It already is though.
>ERROR: Request Entity Too Large
Well shit.
>>135601038
I can't wait. 100% personalized setting to elicit exactly the sensations and emotions I want it to, with my ideal waifu with me every step of the way.
>>135601063
Stop trying to upload absurdres you substantial faggot.
>>135601104
The output should simply be "absurdres - 100%"
>>135601033
It keeps thinking Yuushas are Touhous, I wonder why.
>>135601063
stop trying to upload ur mom LOL
This is pretty good.
>>135601145
I'm pretty sure touhou is the most popular tag it's learned so far, so it assumes a lot of anime is touhou.
>Shirobako is a k-on ripoff
reverse image search + harvest most likely tags
>give it cropped hentai pic
>it can tell
10/10
>>135601300
It uses a neural net.
Totally fucked up this picture of Miku
>Perrine
>Kantai Collection
>upload picture of myself to see what happens
>2. 1girl
>>135601183
Pretty much, it say that any anime character with a funny looking hat is a touhou.
That being said when I do feed it a proper touhou image it's on the money 10 out 10 time getting everything correct from the general tags to properly guessing the character.
>>135601399Now feed it a picture of your pOnOs.
>>135600935
>Chitanda Eru
pretty close though
>>135601371
>completely shaven
>tagged facial hair
Pretty good
>>135601300
I tried drawing my own image to see how it turned out and it still does pretty well.
>>135601411
>implying 80% of all anime-related digital media with hats and weapons isnt touhou
>>135601582
M-may I have that image, anon?
>>135601611
;_;
>>135601582
>it actually knows
what in the fuck
>>135601611
>solo
>1boy
>1girl
>>135601675
You don't see his waifu right behind him?
>>135601675
It knows when a man has his waifu with him at all times.
well fuck son
not bad
>>135600236
Yeah, this thing needs to expand the library of media it has.
I'd assume it'd use some kind of intel gathering system the more people submit to it, but there doesn't seem to be a way to do that.
They could refine shit by letting people add tags or confirm tags that are predicted.
>>135601399
Did better than me if I take my glasses off. Got your result with them on though, maybe it thinks glasses are a female trait.
>>135601912
This is interesting because it got some good ones like "gauntlets" and "mask" and "blunt bangs," but it also said "stuffed toy." The reason I find "stuffed toy" interesting is because Kate is frequently pictured with a stuffed animal, but not in this picture. That makes me a little leery that there's something fishy going on here.
>>135601721
My king is not a Touhou.
>>135601984
>sketch
Not wide enough.
>>135601967
It's doing a reverse image search and aggregating the results. Nothing complicated or mysterious about it.
>>135602034
But that's wrong.
>>135601939
>no humans
>>135602022
Everything is a touhou anon
>>135602034
How is OC explained though?
>>135602069
It does exactly as he described. Even if there are no exact matches it will get some matches.
>>135601967
Kate is probably in it's training set so it's made the association between kate and stuffed animals.
Just neural networks.
>>135602034
how does it aggregate the tags thenfucktard
>>135602054
Prove me wrong then faggot.
>>135602069
Nothing says that the reverse search is all it does.
>>135602138
>not understanding such basic concepts
That's impressive, it actually recognizes the plug suit and the fact that it's Holo wearing it.
>>135601611
>safe
It's already better at identifying stuff than a shitton of idiots who don't think of themselves as newfags but totally are.
>>135602149
>Prove me wrong then faggot.
You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you dodecanigger.
>>135602240
>purple eyes
>blue eyes
Heterochromia?
Never knew this was a cosplay
>>135602244
>tfw someone will make a shitposting AI
>>135602235
Too bad it fails so hard in monochrome.
Good job.
>>135602240
It isn't wrong.
>>135602034
Im no expert but this is done with neural networks, i dont think it googles at all. The idea is you show shitton of pictuers of eg glasses, tell it you are showing glasses, the code remembers what shapes are glasses and then tries to find them.
>>135602307
But anon, we are the shitposting AI.
>>135602069
Don't listen to this faggot. >>135602034
The software uses a convolutional neural network to generate the tags.
Basically the creators feed the system a shit ton of images and their associated tags, probably scraped from the boorus, and it learned how to identify those tags based off of those images.
This is why >>135601967 had the stuffed animal tag. The software does not actually know what a "stuffed animal" is, but does know that pictures of Kate tend to also have this tag.
>>135602307
>tfw someone will make a quality posting AI
>>135601912
>>135601947
How do you feel that this anon is masturbating to your art? Please explain your feelings in great detail for research purposes.
>>135602292
Not him, but the person who made the claim can be either one of you depending on how you phrase your statements.
Burden of proof belongs to both parties. If you don't care enough to have evidence to support your opinion, you shouldn't speak. Even if your opinion is right, unless you came to that opinion with a clear and rational method, you're just a broken clock that's displaying the right time by sheer coincidence.
>>135602307
Already exists. Where do you think all the other posts come from?
I tried using a shitty old doodle to test if it could recognize the character and it actually worked.
>>135602307
>>135602371
These already exist, and have existed for years.
Trying some fanart that I don't think is on any boorus.
Kind of a failure here. Kamina ought to be pretty easy to recognize.
>>135602371
>tfw someone will make a CUTE AI
>>135602400
>Burden of proof belongs to both parties.
Ya, no
Do they not teach people elementary philosophy anymore?
10/10
>>135602435
It probably has a harder time with profile shots.
Yukari is 2% questionable.
>>135602483
You're arguing with a person too retarded to realize that a reverse image system can't recognize OC. What do you think?
Is this FOSS?
>>135602483
Apparently they can't teach you logic. There's a reason scientists and researchers document and publish their work even if the work confirms or matches up with already preconceived beliefs.
Always be prepared to provide evidence to support your stance in an argument. Urging the person you're with to do the legwork while you do nothing is arrogant and typically the stance of people who didn't actually know what they were talking about in the first place.
yeah nah
it's a picture of a maze
>>135602555
Pay attention, shit kicker. First 2 words of my post were "Not him".
![[Commie] Koufuku Graffiti - 03 [17232E81].mkv_snapshot_09.56_[2015.01.25_00.13.54].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ZYSkCgm.jpg "[Commie] Koufuku Graffiti - 03 [17232E81].mkv_snapshot_09.56_[2015.01.25_00.13.54].jpg")
>>135602436
tfw someone will make aKEIT-AI
>>135602307
>tfw lewdposting with an AI
>>135602555
Not that anon, but if this thing used reverse image search it would be a lot more accurate. Reverse image search can identify these characters by name.
>>135602582
>invisible dragons exist
>oh yeah? prove it
>nuh uh, you prove the opposite first
>>135602371
>tfw someone will make a waifu ai
>>135602635
It's more accurate than I thought
>>135602598
All those characters are trapped in the maze and it found them all? Sugoi!
>>135602629
>character by name
>OC
>>135602623
tfw someone willFIND A WAY.
>>135602598
>everyone
What does it mean?
4chanx integration when?
Oh waitsoucefags can't into 4chanx
>>135602582
If you can read this
>>135602149
>>135602034
And not think the burden of proof is on him alone, then you are either retarded, or understand literally nothing about burden of proof.
Proof of rampant retardation:
>>135602582
>>135602400
Your own post
>>135602659
You don't seem to understand what I'm saying.
Most of these characters aren't being identified by their name. The ones people are posting examples of, I mean. Take >>135602544 for instance. Google reverse image search will tell you that this is Yukari from Yuyushiki. If this tool were using reverse image search, there's no reason it wouldn't identify that also.
someone should do this photo
>>135602730
its not hard to do it yourself you kno
>>135602726
Apparently I can't read.
Apologies /a/non.
>>135602718
>>135602742
no one asked u
>>135602582
You are a complete and utter loser. Now that I have made a claim, it's your responsibility to prove me wrong. Welcome to your own logic.
>>135602730
>>135602766
You don't have to apologize, but I appreciate it. I was just trying to clarify what I was saying.
I'm really just curious about this tool and how it works, so I'm interested in any and all theories.
Its okay, I'll stick to google
>>135602810
>Beatrice 100%
Jessitrice confirmed.
>>135602598
>Chen
>>135602623
Sending nukes to you place anon, fuck you
>>135602693
MINAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
>>135602852
I'm having fun with this,
>>135602646
>You: Invisible dragons don't exist
>Him: Prove it
>You: Nu uh, you prove they do exist first
Do you understand now what I meant about it mattering how you phrase the statements. Whether something is a positive claim or a negative claim all boils down to language, and insisting that the burden of proof lies with the person making a claim is hogwash.
>>135602723
Apparently I have a more refined concept of burden of proof. I don't get on a soapbox and act like I'm above proving my opinion if proof can be provided. I don't ignorantly assert an opinion without at least the desire to explain myself.
Don't be ignorant.
>>135602784
You've almost got it. Anyone can make a claim and that claim can be positive or negative. Only the claims that can be supported with evidence should be taken seriously. Who puts the claim (positive or negative) out there is irrelevant. If you care enough to have an opinion about it, you should care enough to make sure through your own effort that your opinion is correct. Burden of proof lies with everyone interested in the truth. Whether you feel like expressing that truth to other people is your prerogative, but what you don't get to do is act like you're correct without backing it up.
>They know it's a boy
How?
>>135602868
Heh
>>135602962
>hat
>>135602969
That's clearly a male face.
>striped
>>135602969
lust for boypussy is well understood by AI as well
>>135603005
Well, it's not exactly wrong.
>>135602968
All claims are positive claims for the purpose of determining burden of proof you goddamn moron.
I'm just really interested in this now
How can it tell one of these pictures is yuri and the other isn't? Is it something to do with the faces?
>>135603005
Yes, striped. Having stripes. Not stripped.
>>135603069
Holding hands is something really sexual.
>>135603147
Both pictures have the girls holding hands.
>>135603061
So two people making contradictory statements is the same as two people making two positive claims. In order to be in an argument you have to make a stance, and for that stance to be valid there needs to be proof. Since it's not your responsibility to prove they're wrong, it's your responsibility to prove you're right. No matter what kind of bullshit the other person may be saying, if you want to participate in the argument you need to provide evidence that backs up YOUR claim; even if your claim is just the complete opposite of nonsense.
Behaving like you don't need to provide evidence is incorrect. Insisting other people should provide proof while you don't is the hidey hole of ignorant cunts.
>pokemon
>>135602969
>otoko no ko
it knows more than you think
Can the two people here arguing about the burden of proof and evidence please just add each other on Facebook or something?
Spot on
>kantai collection
>an AI will organize all of your porn for you in a few years
>>135602623
Already exists, it's calledSiri.
what´s the point of this crap?
>>135603337
Integration into Hydrus when?
>>135603337
>can never find that one picture you need to squirt one to in time because it was moved
>>135603351
auto-tagging for booru
>>135603200
>>135603061
>>135602968
>>135602582
>>135602483
>>135602400
>>135602292
>>135602149
Instead of arguing about burden of proof and whatnot have you guys tried, I dunno, actually reading the documentation and the entire paper on the program which is conveniently linked on the page itself? It's probably more productive to actually look at the proof which is easily accessible than to try and get the other guy to do it for you.
Even works on stuff from drawthreads.
Neat.
>>135603351
science
This is one step towards a much larger picture.
Another example of it "guessing" tags.
Kyubey isn't in here but it's one of the character guesses.
>>135603416
I wasn't a part of the argument about the program. I was only ridiculing someone for being lazy and ignorant.
>>135603320
>2boys
>1girl
>1boy
I think we've gotten this AI drunk.
>>135603455
Of course it's guessing tags.
It gets fed a shit ton of examples and then it tries to make associations on those samples. After a while, it's able to associate new data relatively correctly.
>questionable
>>135603455
>I'm 100% sure that this photo is Kyouko but I think I'll add 25% just in case I'm wrong
>>135603464
Nobody is interested in that except you.
>>135602307
A shitposting AI, you say?
>>135603423
I was about to comment on that
>>135603520
That's not how it works mate.
>>135603526that's ok
>>135603351
it´s missing the "pussy" tag.
Yusha-fags on suicide watch.
Where is this damn hat though?
>>135603069
Interesting indeed. My theory:
Theres more clutter in the image. Also notice how yuri is the last one in the list, it just barely had the score high enough to be shown. Second just had more stuff in it. So it's false false negative?
>ERROR: INTERNAL SERVER ERROR
I'm always late to these things.
>>135603580
>Madoka Magica
>>135603622
It does that with some images. Try a different image.
>>135603622
Still works for me; try again.
>stupid demotivational from whenever
>almost 50% touhou
>>135603200
>In order to be in an argument you have to make a stance
>it's not your responsibility to prove they're wrong, it's your responsibility to prove you're right
I'm not trained in philosophy but I never heard of both of these definitions so I assume they're your made up headcanon. You can "be in an argument" without taking a stance, as in you can participate in a conversation without making positive claims, and it's quite easy to do. For instance if someone says "spirits are real", and you respond "how do you know that?". You didn't make any positive claim, you simply asked a question and in doing so implicitly shifted the burden of proof onto the other guy. Rumor has it that socrates liked doing just that, asking a lot of questions while never making any positive claims of his own which made it very frustrating for the people he was talking with because they could never get him to make claims that are wrong.
![2XJoV7A[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/OUg765a.png "2XJoV7A[1].png")
>saekano is hentai
>>135603634
It guessing Tomoe Mami is even better
>>135603684
This thing will be like the Paperclip maximizer but with Touhou
shit
I would just like to point out that this AI has no clue who Ayano is. Upload literally any picture of her and it will just tag a different Yuru Yuri character, usually Yui
>>135603733
So /jp/?
>>135603684
Probably cause of those touhou "her reaction to you saying things" pics or something
>>135603687
I love that there are so many touhou and kancolle pics in its database that it thinks there's a 30% chance they're there even if it has no reason to believe they are.
At least I'd assume it's doing something like that.
>6. flat chest
>12. otoko no ko
>>135603785
someone translate this for me please
>>135603817
I'm more interested in the 1.33% of it being questionable content.
But I guess neither of them are wearing shirts, so that kind of makes sense.
>>135603622
>>135603658
>>135603661
Tried with a smaller image, it didn't work. Shortened the filename and it now works.
>inb4 something about the tabs
>>135603718
>"spirits are real", and you respond "how do you know that?"
Voicing an objection or a question to prompt someone to explain their opinion carries with it the implicit statement that you disagree, which you just conceded is the same as making a positive claim of your own. As I said before, participating in the argument means taking a stance. Even if the stance you take is not necessarily the stance you believe in, a stance was made that the original person now has to respond to as if that stance you made was legitimate and opposing.
tl;dr: The fastest way to prove someone wrong is by proving yourself right, not playing devil's advocate and waiting for them to weasel out of it.
>>135603785
Nope, upload any image without characters (even just a plain color) and it will consistently tag it as Touhou, presumably just because it got fed too much Touhou
>>135603857
>parody
DON'T YOU TALK SHIT ABOUT FILICIA!
>>135603856
There's probably relatively little questionable/explicit data in its training set or else it would think everything is dicks.
>>135603857
>botnet
>>135603830
Please be less lazy in the future anon.
http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/1079628?tags=parent%3A1079628
>Character Tag: Link
I can see its reasoning.
>ERROR: Bad Gateway
>>135603901
Firefox would be kill
>>135603857
Holy shit anon close some tabs.
You are giving me a headache.
>>135603901
The botnet is too deep within the system, I can't do anything about it. I've been using Linux though, I'll eventually move fulltime on the desktop as well.
Also,
>implying this demo isn't botnet as well
>>135603979
I usually have 200+ tabs open and Firefox works fine.
>>135603857
I can't see anything wrong with your tabs (although there are a couple of icons I don't recognize), but why do you not have 4chan X?
>>135604028
>>135603857
>tfw you're almost done cleaning up your tabs
Just 20 more sad panda tabs to go through
Did anyone get more than 19 results on the general tag list yet?
>>135603885
>Voicing an objection or a question to prompt someone to explain their opinion carries with it the implicit statement that you disagree
That's wrong, you could be asking someone to prove something that you also know is right just to see if they know the proof. Do you not understand what asking a question is? Do you think questions are inherently antagonistic?
>The fastest way to prove someone wrong is by proving yourself right
This is also very wrong. The main and best way to prove someone wrong is to genuinely make them understand the flaws of their own logic. If you manage to prove a contrary position that only creates a contradiction, someone might agree with what you said but also still agree with what they believe.
>>135600236
This is so wrong.
>>135603603
I cut down on the noise in the picture and swapped their eyes and I'm still not getting yuri.
I dunno but I'm determined to somehow get yuri to work on this picture
Even the AI knows that all KyoAni shows look the same.
>>135604028
Firefox responds like a boat even with one tab compared to chrome. But I prefer Firefox otherwise. I have used both for many years switching every few years.
>>135601866
>1girl
>Neon Genesis Evangelion
pffft lol holy shit.
>>135604140
I like how it's 26.9% certain of fellatio, but still gives an 81.5% chance of being safe.
>>135603765
Huh, you're right. Poor Ayano.
It doesn't seem to know Chitose either, it either doesn't recognize her or thinks she's Sakuya Izayoi.
>>135604172
Get rid of the scarf too. It's time to draw, anon.
>>135603519
>>135604105
>you could be asking someone to prove something that you also know is right just to see if they know the proof
Which is taking the stance of devil's advocate and asking them to respond as if you disagree.
ACTING like you don't have a dissenting opinion (which is what compelled you to ask them to explain themselves in the first place) in order to escape the responsibility of explaining your own opinion that contradicts theirs is the problem I was trying to illustrate to you.
Stop behaving like other people should have to prove themselves while you don't.
>The main and best way to prove someone wrong is to genuinely make them understand the flaws of their own logic.
First of all, I didn't say it was always going to be the best way. I said it was the fastest way. Please read more carefully.
Secondly, very often providing clear cut evidence why they are wrong is the best way for them to understand the flaws in their own logic. Trying to coach someone through understanding something on their own is an enormous waste of time; especially on a fucking imageboard.
If you don't care enough to prove your own opinion right, obviously you shouldn't speak. If you can't be bothered to provide evidence that supports your opinion, it's very likely you don't have any and shouldn't speak.
>>135603897
We need to introduce this program to penises.
>>135603069
hand around the small of the back pulling the pelvis into her.
About as sexual as it gets.
>>135604172
Dunno how far you'll get with that, neural nets are pretty arbitrary in how they recognize things.
>>135603423
that 99% haruhi, nice
>>135604320
1. penis
2. circumsized
3. small penis
It tried
>>135604320
AI is not for lewd
>>135604423
Don't be such a fuddy duddy.
>>135604172
>>135604299
>>135604381
Without the faces I no longer get yuri on this image even though it recognizes that it's two girls.
Has to be something with the faces.
>>135604140
>fellatio: 26.9%
That's not really that big of a deal. AI clearly isn't confident about it being fellatio or else it would have ranked it higher. This sort of stuff will get ironed out the more it learns.
ITT: retards who don't know what AI means
It's an algorithm with searches for pre-defined tags, not AI.
Pretty weirdly accurate...still doesn't explain the nips
>>135604468
For argument's sake, leave the faces and censor out the hands.
>>135604557
I dunno what I'm even doing, really. Just the faces and I don't get yuri either. It must be a combination of factors and not something you can just single out.
>>135604557
>For argument's sake, leave the faces and censor out the hands.
Why does this sound so funny?
>>135604313
That's a magical girl alright.
>>135604468
Its as >>135604381 said, trying to understand what neural network is doing is literally as hard understanding our brains.
>>135604606
I think it needs to recognize that the hand touching the face belongs to the girl on the right. That's a pretty gay thing to do.
Wow, one of the authors of this is in the same university department as me!
>>135604664
Give him your entire porn stash on a thumb drive so he can improve his program's effectiveness.
>>135604688
This thing needs to become a well-versed slut ASAP.
>>135604664
Say hi to him for us.
Wrong series AI-kun.
Snickers is best girl.
>every hat anime girl is touhou
>>135604608
>>135604606
I'm starting to read this as CERN scientists trying to isolate the yuritron.
>>135604737
You have to admit it that that is one silly hat.
>>135604316
>Which is taking the stance of devil's advocate and asking them to respond as if you disagree.
This is 100% your assumption, you can ask a question for any number of reasons. It's also 100% irrelevant to burden of proof because what your stance is irrelevant, only what you said. I could even explicitly tell you that I hold a contrary position to a claim you made or you could know this about me because you knew my personal beliefs before you made the claim and it still wouldn't make any difference as far as burden of proof in concerned. Burden of proof lies with whoever is making the claim, and it is so for one main purpose which is to force people to have to prove dumb shit they're claiming instead of dumping the responsibility onto the other party and making them disprove the claim which is ironically the very laziness you're speaking against.
We can sum burden of proof into two statements which I'm sure you'll agree with. 1: you should absolutely always have to back up what you say and 2: you shouldn't force someone to have to back up things they haven't said, but do believe in.
>>135604737
I broke the streak.
>>135604737
She's really Touhou-ish, and consideribg the author did Advent Cirno
A little MS paint experiment
Spoilered for tasteful nudityHer name is Big Tit Sandy, by the way, she's my OC. Please don't fall in love
>hidamari sketch
I don't even.
>>135604872
I find the explicit tag being so low kind of interesting. Or would it need to be hardcore for that?
>>135603069
Maybe the show they're from is yuri?
>>135604872
>perfect tagging
Beautiful.
>>135604987
I'm curious. Maybe if I spread her legs and give her a big beaver it'll consider her explicit.
