>there's people on this board who pick an anime based on how cute the girls on the cover are
>there is people
>>135401864
>muh escapism
Joke's on you, I pick based on how cute the boys are.
>>135401864
If I'm going to watch shit at least I'll let my dick choose.
>>135401864
If you only care about the events and not how it looks, read a fucking book. I'll continue watching anime with cute girls and enjoying the cute girls.
>there are people alive in this very instant who actually believe K-On! is worthwhile entertainment
>>135402007
>worthwhile
No one cares.
>there's people on this board
>>135402133
Who?
>>135402166
Me.
>>135401946
I always laugh when moetards use this argument to defend their pieces of garbage.
Pretty much, only its lolis and traps.
I've picked an anime once based on how cute the girls were. In a fanart.
>>135402497
I believe the more correct terminology would be moelard, since fans of the moe sub-genre of anime are all inevitably obese and intellectually underwhelming.
>>135402133
Is that a shoop? What's up with that shirt?
Who's moot?
>>135402855
>>135401864
Character design is a good indication of the animation quality and plot/content of the show.
>>135401864
>on the cover
You're watching boxed anime?
>>135402855
A tripfag worse than Komeiji.
Same fags who circlejerk all day in their shitty generals. Makes even the good shows undiscussable on here.
>>135401864
I watched KnK purely for Mitsuki. Needless to say I was thoroughly disappointed.
>>135402714
I noticed this, every thread about those moeshits are only about which girls is the most cute.
They are even worse than My Little Poney fans.
>>135401864
>cover
>Are you manly /a/?
>>135404227
>mfw I do this but I want to be a little girl instead
Do you mean cute girls like this?
>implying you can make ugly characters with anime artstyle without trying really hard
