Who are your favorite animators /a/?
Post webms of good animation and discuss animators.
>/a/
>knowing animators
There's a reason why Me!Me!Me! was the only one of those projects anyone even bothered talking about.
>>124028483
Why?
>>124028483
I meant why doesn't /a/ know animators not why was Me!Me!Me! the only one anyone cared about, that part is obvious.
>>124028442
sauce pls.
>>124028955
Hakkenden 10
>>124029107
>>124028442
this is shit animation.
>>124029153
This is bad opinion.
>>124028528
>>124028667
Because /a/ is filled with casuals who don't know anything about anime.
>>124029153
What is bad about it please explain?
>>124028442
>artist unknown
Who's drawing this scene ? Okiura ?
>>124028442
http://a.pomf.se/fbyeuz.webm
>>124029259
The girl isn't cute enough
You YoshinariKou a shit.
>>124028483
because it's the only decent one
>>124029755
See you wouldn't say that if you educated yourself with regards to animation.
>>124029786
well okay
the cockroach one was also decent
but the others, especially in regards to the animation alone, are lousy
>>124029835
That's not true though plenty of them have creative and interesting animation in them. Animation isn't some race for an objective best.
>>124029722
/thread
Chinese slave #214 is my favorite.
>>124029722
The girl in windy tales is moe as fuck.
Obari for robutts, Yoshinari for effects and explosions and Norio Matsumoto for martial arts combat.
>Go to salkugabooru
>find a webm
>save it
>post it here
Why not just link to the sakuga booru if you're going to dump at all here...?
Anyways, Shingo Yamashita does some sweet-ass animation. I love the crispiness of his timing, and the way he can use smears effectively (like he did in Birdy Decode)
>>124030554
>crispiness
The what now?
These threads are pointless without opinions
They used to work 2 years ago with just gifs, but now it's redundant
>>124030775
His snappy timing is so attractive
http://sakuga.yshi.org/post/show/6269/
http://sakuga.yshi.org/post/show/6259/
>>124031062
Sakugafags can't actually elaborate on any of their opinions, they just throw around positive-sounding words like "weight" and "timing" and "convincing character action" and know that no one will question them as long as they're talking about an animator who's already been collectively agreed to be good.
>>124031899
Sounds like you just don't like opinions
>>124031899
I'm not really sure how you are supposed to be more specific than that. You either see what they are referring to when it is in motion and agree or don't and disagree? I mean how much further can you break it down? It's not as if you are realistically going to do a frame by frame analysis and explain how each drawing leads to the impression you get. It is like looking at a piece of art and talking about what you think of it rather than an objective analysis.
>>124032604
It's the difference between talking about the piece and talking about the technique.
Of course, the better one understands technique, it's easier to see what an artist is going for and to get into their thought process.
