Why are lolis so banned?
To protect the 3D children.
canadians are weird
http://strawpoll.me/3843377
http://exhentai.org/s/ab009ca45e/772774-3
I don't care if lolis are illegal. I'll still post them because I personally don't see anything wrong with them.
>>122366666
>>122366699
>>122366733
>>122366666
Dat lolibutt still needs a spank. Should teach her not to bother people.
>>122366937
Have at it then.
To protect the Canadians
>>122366666
They're not. Even if they were the power of Satanic quints would overcome it.
Just make it a point to send feedbacks whenever a SFW thread gets deleted.
Probably just some dumbass new janitor who doesn't know how things work. (Makes me regret not applying if fags are the best they can get.)
>>122367236
Who exactly do you email to say that the Jan's are fucking up? I'm lost without moot.
>>122366666
Stop tempting me Satan!
>>122367355
/feedback is back online.
>>122366996
lolis in chinadresses are too lewd for /a/, you know this
>>122367429
>manga where the selling point is a loli succubi who literally needs to drink semen to survive
>manga will never actually feature her drinking semen canonically- offscreen or otherwise
Fuck this gay earth.
>>122367508
And you can bet if she wasn't a loli she'd have taken her first dick on page one.
>>122367508
I really don't know what the point of the show is.
>>122367639
Not necessarily, she's still his daughter so they'd save it till the end at least.
>>122366666
>closet pedophiles
>>122368246
Are you implying that moralfags are closet pedophiles?
>>122368246
>whatever cancerous 3DPD whore lover
>>122366666
I don't get why people don't like lolis. No actual kids are harmed or even affected by their existence. Most people who like them (on here at least) are disgusted by the thought of interacting with anything 3D and would never look at a real kid that way. If anything, governments should be pushing this shit on pedophiles to try and stop them from wanting to diddle real kids.
What type of loli is your favorite?
>>122366666
Thought crimes!
>>122369363
the smug, lewd, dominant type.
>>122369408
George Orwell pls go
>>122369408
I want to commit a thought crime.
>>122369490
Maybe he means lolis are banned because they make people think of crimes. I know every time I see a loli I can't stop thinking about carjacking. I mean, every time I see a loli my mind immediately goes to jacking it.
>>122369363
The type that's small,cuddly and has a cute butt.Me with the nopan on the bottom right.
>>122369363
Me on the left
>>122366666
>Why are lolis so banned?
In my country, Britain, loli (artwork) is banned if it meets the following criteria:
>1. Would a reasonable person, given the totality of the circumstances, believe the article in question (the depiction) contains a girl who appears to be underage?
>2. [Would a reasonable person ... circumstances] believe the article contains sexually explicit, derogatory, lascivious, or crude elements AND (see 3);
>3. Does the article lack series literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?
>If the article meets constraints 1-3, it is not protected by A.10 ยง. 13-15 (Free Expression clause).
>>122369363
It's a toss-up between smug slutty loli or strong-willed and cool loli.
>>122369363
Me with the megane
>>122369666
>Country which banned porn of female ejaculation
>>122369666
>reasonable person
What a silly law, Britain has no reasonable people.
>>122369363
Ones with butts.
>>122369734
>female ejaculation
>>122369666
No idea where you got that from, but it's wrong. It's banned if all 3 of the following apply:
1) A reasonable person would think that the image (or set of images if part of a set) was produced for the purposes of sexual gratification
2) The image focuses solely or principally on the genitals or anal region of the child, or the image depicts one of a shopping list of sexual acts being performed on or in the presence of a child
3) The image is obscene (don't get me started on what constitutes obscenity)
A "child" is defined as someone who a reasonable person would think was under 18. So a 500 year old loli is a child, but so is someone with a fully adult body if the context of the image implies the person is under 18.
There is no exception for things of literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
>>122369803
There's lolis without butts?
What will it be?
>>122369891
[x] touch fluffy tail
>>122369806
The BBFC (which classifies this shit) claims that there is no such thing as female ejaculation and that it's really pissing. You can show sex, you can show pissing, but you can't show pissing and sex. So because FE is supposedly pissing and it occurs at the point of orgasm, which is during sex, it's banned.
>>122369891
Don't remember the name of that manga but it was fucking great.
Hard to go wrong with kemonomimi in general.
>>122369891
Both
>>122369929
so basically, pissing+sex is outlawed?
kek at pissfags
>>122369891
>oppai loli
Disgusting. Komugi has the better personality anyways.
>>122369891
Best creature of course
>>122369483
so you've read Kodomo No Jiakn, right?
>>122369978
>not loving all lolis
There's just more of them to love, anon.
>>122370039
Is that her dick?
>>122370079
No it's his dick x-raying through her
>>122370079
In a way, yes.
