How much value do you put into visual direction?
How much value do you put in making the same thread over and over again?
A lot that's why I fugging love SHAFT
>>118291785
It usually helps making crap contents more tolerable but they're basically pointless with no storytelling skills to back it up.
Pulling the hue slider so the picture is all red or blue is not art.
Lens flare is not art.
I fear the day when they'll find a way to HDR their own drawings.
>>118292140
But their visual direction sucks.
>>118292900
this
Modern anime is pretty much a diversion to me. I don't expect much art from it, although it's nice when art does show up.
>>118291785
Who cares
>>118292900
Fuck off, kyoanus licker.
![90il5vm[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/8ek0RxB.jpg "90il5vm[1].png")
>>118292900
>>118292935
Samefag.
![5_centimeters_per_second[1904x1072.h264.flac][niizk].mkv_snapshot_00.12.16_[2014.12.13_19.18.38].png](https://i.imgur.com/2bmZJko.jpg "5_centimeters_per_second[1904x1072.h264.flac][niizk].mkv_snapshot_00.12.16_[2014.12.13_19.18.38].png")
Makoto Shinkai does good photorealism for example.
I really liked Nisekoi because it steered away from standard school/rom com generic look
NGNL was shit because they just shoved post fx and bloom on everything instead of drawing it well.
It doesn't matter what visual direction it takes, as long as it does it effectively.
![nxkxo1t[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/tLZYgol.jpg "nxkxo1t[1].jpg")
![8zPYKEG[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/d1Os9cn.jpg "8zPYKEG[1].jpg")
SHAFT is too good.
Their anime are being studied by film students in Japan.
>>118291785
Adding bokeh and bloom to everything is not visual direction.
>>118292900
Why
>>118293352
>>118293282
>>118293088
adding orange filters does not make it good visual direction
>>118293444
adding blue filters does not make it good visual direction
>>118293352
Shaft isn't that good. They do good backgrounds and action sequences, but their characters are really bland.
>>118293520
>filters
That proved you know nothing about cinematography.
>>118293520
How's that retardation working out for you?
>>118293582
No one in this thread does. Neither do you.
>>118293553
We're talking about visual direction here, idiot.
>but their characters are really bland
lol it's like you never wacthed bakemonokatari and madoka
>>118293520
>adding orange filters does not make it good visual direction
Pleb taste. Orange is objectively the best color.
>>118293631
>>118293592
>>118293582
>All these butt hurt SHAFT lickers
hehe
>>118293625
>bakemonokatari
The only semi-interesting character in Bake is Hitagi
>Madoka
There are no characters in this, only plot devices.
>>118293620
I'm a film student.
>>118293253
That's not photorealism and visual direction is not about some specific direction like north or east. A work does not "take a visual direction".
Shinkai is great but why does his work always attract pretentious idiots?
>>118293625
I'm talking about visual direction as well. Or are the characters and BGs not drawn in the anime you watch?
Both bakemonokatari and madoka have really bland character designs visually.
>>118293864
Fuck off reterd.
>>118293855
It isn't exactly photorealism no, but I think the term works fine considering he drawns a lot closer to realism than most anime.
I might be wrong, but I always use visual direction as a synonym for aesthetic choice, as in the style its drawn in.
>>118293962
Convincing argument shaftdrone
>>118291785
Visual direction
Art direction
Character design
>>118293520
Kill urself mang
>>118293520
The scene compositions are fantastic. You'd probably say Goya's Dog is terrible because its all one color and so bland.
Spikiest threads on /a/
>>118291785
>how much do you care about visual direction in a visual medium
>>118293444
>>118293520
Improved by adding orange filter.
>>118294251
>>118291785
Don't really give a shit, as long as the girls are cute.
>>118293631
Bet you pair it with blue color side by side.
>>118291785
A lot.
>>118294887
Friendly reminder that blue/orange contrast has an ingrained appeal in humanity from millennia of staring at campfires and sunsets, and if you feel an aversion to it it's because you're on a bandwagon.
>>118294887
I prefer to pair orange with a warm gray. The color of blue is implied even in its absence. Such is the power of orange.
I care a lot, but I don't care if a movie isn't visually beautiful.
>>118295500
2/?
>>118295552
3/3
Only posting these three...
Just tell me if I should post more. Take note that I have posted all of my collage at least once on /a/ and on /tv/, so you might recognize.
>>118295500
>>118295623
Source?
>>118293352
What is there to study?
They have no budget so they just throw some random shit together and do lots of close ups and crap.
You have to be some kind of special retard to think there is any meaning to the fanservice/harem garbage they make.
>>118293088
Bully for you, because my favorite TV studio is Madhouse.
Best movie studio is a toss-up between Ghibli, Chizu or CoMix Wave.
>>118295751
>118295500
Asura. It's a shitty movie. Characters designs are ugly and the movie as a whole is average. Although, when everyone chases Asura, it's great, it may have to do with the music that pays during all.
>118295623
Great movie. Watch it. Pameta Inverted.
>>118291785
Well, it is a visual medium... Too bad I can never really can't sit through the turds KyoAnus shits out so I guess I don't care THAT much...
>>118295751
I'll be nice
>>118295500 is Asura by Toei. It's CGI with an average story, but the action and visual direction is fucking top-notch.
>>118295552 Kotonoha no Niwa by Shinkai.
>>118291785
A lot, which is why I don't watch anything by KeyshitAnimation or SHA(f)T.
>>118295623
Now that's the stuff.
Does anyone have one for Uchouten Kazoku?
You fucked up OP. You could have just made a normal cinematography/scene composition thread, but instead you made a shitposting thread.
