hey /3/, can I get a critique for the 3d model face that I made?
is the overall topology right or good enough for facial animation? I intend to put some more edgeloops and remove some to make better edge flow, but I am wondering if the topology is good enough.
>>517361
this the side view of it
>>517362
this is the perspective view
anyone?
>>517361
It depends if it's realistic or stylized. Is it a base mesh to be sculpted on or the final piece. Best practice is to sculpt first then worry about topology later.
I like it, good job anon
>>517371
>Best practice is to sculpt first then worry about topology later.
Kill yourself senpai
Proper topo then sculpting > sculpting then retopo
>>517361
Looks like a cute girl. Gr8 job m8. Very nice topology
>>517378
Sculpting changes the topo so you have to re-topo anyway. Your way seems like double the work.
>>517361
The poles near the nose and mouth may cause pinching problems. You'd generally want to avoid poles in deforming areas.
looks cute from the front. is it textured yet ?
>>517383
I always use my good topology lowpoly human templates as a base for the sculpt, and afterwards i just need to edit the lowpoly to get as near to the sculpt as possible, for me this is less work than doing an entire new retopo model for each sculpt again and again. Especially because my template is already optimized for animation. Works for me at least.
>>517416
And for me.
>>517416
This
So much more stress-free, slave off at the start, then relax til the end; hell you can even UV it prior to sculpting, which allowed me to do situational things like sculpt from displacement for basic detail and markings
>>517361
Looks like a nice face. I'm hardly an expert, but it certainly looks believable. Great job!
those 5 edge poles where the laugh lines are look like they're gona be a pain in the ass. I would consider taking that awkward looking horizontal edge that loops through the upper lip, and continuing it up to the bottom of the eye. You remove a pole and get some more roundness to the lower eye.
>>517416
Would you perhaps share said low poly human model?
